Find a
Nursing Home
Residential Care
/ Assisted Living
CCRCs Medi-Cal for
Long Term Care
Elder Abuse
/ Financial Abuse
Find Elder Abuse Attorneys in CA

Resident Rights Litigation


CANHR v. Dooley, No. 3:15-cv-05120. This federal lawsuit filed in 2015 charges that the State Health and Human Services Agency is willfully violating federal laws that protect against dumping nursing home residents into hospitals. For years, California nursing homes have been sending Medi-Cal residents to acute care hospitals and refusing to allow them to return to the nursing homes where they reside, primarily to increase profits and make space for more lucrative Medicare and private pay residents. Federal law forbids this practice by requiring states like California to offer a readmission hearing that provides for the “prompt” readmission of residents. While the State provides a hearing, it is refusing to enforce the hearing decisions, leaving patients with no way to return home. CANHR is represented by Matt Borden of BraunHagey & Borden LLP.

CANHR v. Chapman, No. RG13700100. A case filed in Alameda County Superior Court in 2013. Judge Evelio Grillo ruled nursing homes that give mind-altering drugs and withdraw life-sustaining treatment to “unrepresented” residents are violating the state constitution and must stop immediately.  The Court found Health and Safety Code §1418.8, a law allowing nursing homes to make routine medical decisions for residents who lack mental capacity and do not have family or other surrogate decision-makers, facially unconstitutional for its failure to provide residents with any notice they had been determined “incapacitated” or that medical decisions were being considered without their input. The Court also held that the state constitution prohibits nursing homes from drugging residents or withdrawing life-sustaining treatment without more due process than Section 1418.8 provides. The case was brought by Professor Mort Cohen of Golden Gate University Law School.

California Advocates for Nursing Home Reform et al. v. California Department of Health Services, No. CPF–05–505749, order for writ of mandate (Cal. Super. Ct., San Francisco County Sept. 27, 2006). CANHR and two individual plaintiffs filed suit against the Department for failing to investigate complaints against California nursing homes as required by law. The Department was ordered to comply with the statutory requirements and to complete investigation of the "backlogged" complaints within a specified period of time. CANHR was represented by Chris Healey, of Luce, Forward in San Diego and Michael Thamer, Esq.
Click here to download the order (pdf)

CANHR v. Shewry, No. CGC04–437210, Stipulation and Settlement Agreement, (Cal. Superior Court, April 28, 2006) CANHR and several members filed suit against the Department of Health Services for failure to comply with the statutory provisions regarding access to ownership information on nursing homes. CANHR recently filed a contempt motion to compel the Department to comply with the settlement agreement. CANHR is represented by the law firm of Amitai Schwartz, Esq., Emeryville, CA.
Click here to download the order (pdf)

BANHR v. DHS: Informed Consent Regulations: A lawsuit brought by CANHR (at that time "BANHR,") as an organizational plaintiff, and litigated by Mort Cohen, a Professor at Golden Gate University School of Law, resulted in the promulgation of nursing home regulations restricting the use of chemical and physical restraints without first obtaining the informed consent of the resident or the resident’s legal representative. The regulations culminated seven years of efforts by CANHR to reduce the use of chemical and physical restraints in California’s nursing homes.

Page Last Modified: January 7, 2016